Current:Home > InvestWhat is the U.K. plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda? -ProfitQuest Academy
What is the U.K. plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda?
View
Date:2025-04-13 03:51:37
London — The British parliament passed a law late Monday that will mean asylum seekers arriving on British shores without prior permission can be sent to Rwanda and forbidden from ever returning to the U.K. The British government says the law will act as deterrent to anyone trying to enter the U.K. "illegally."
The contentious program was voted through after the U.K.'s Supreme Court ruled it to be unlawful, and it has been condemned by human rights groups and the United Nations refugee agency.
King Charles III, who now must give the Rwanda bill his royal ascent to make it an official law, reportedly criticized the plan as "appalling" almost two years ago as it took shape.
Hours after the law was passed, French officials said at least five people drowned, including a child, in the English Channel during an attempt to make it to the U.K. on an overcrowded small boat. Officials later clarified that the five fatalities were caused by a crush among the more than 110 people who had crowded onto the boat. CBS News' partner network BBC News reported Wednesday that British law enforcement had arrested three men in the U.K. in connection with the incident.
Why would the U.K. send asylum seekers to Rwanda?
The Rwanda plan was put together by Britain's Conservative government in response to a number of migrant and asylum seeker arrivals on British shores in small boats from France.
With local asylum programs underfunded and overwhelmed, the government has been housing asylum seekers in hotels, where they are effectively trapped and unable to work until their claims are processed, which can take years. These hotels cost the government around 8 million pounds — almost $10 million in taxpayer money — every day to rent, according to CBS News partner BBC News.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's government says the Rwanda policy will act as a deterrent to prevent migrants and asylum seekers from trying to reach the U.K. in the first place.
What is the U.K.'s Rwanda law?
The new policy will give Britain's immigration authorities power to send any asylum seeker entering the U.K. "illegally" after January 2022 to Rwanda. Those individuals can also be forbidden from ever applying for asylum in the U.K.
It will apply to anyone who arrives in the U.K. without prior permission — anyone who travels on a small boat or truck — even if their aim is to claim asylum and they have legitimate grounds to do so.
These people can, under the new law, be immediately sent to Rwanda, 4,000 miles away in East Africa, to have their asylum claim processed there. Under the law they could be granted refugee status in Rwanda and allowed to stay.
What are the issues with the Rwanda law?
The law has been the subject of intense controversy and political wrangling.
In November 2023, the U.K. Supreme Court ruled the program was unlawful and violated the European Convention on Human Rights, because it said genuine refugees would be at risk of being deported back to their home countries, where they could face harm. The judgment also cited concerns with Rwanda's human rights record.
The final legislation passed late Monday orders the court to ignore parts of the Human Rights Act and other U.K. and international rules, such as the Refugee Convention, that would also block the deportations to Rwanda, the BBC reported.
Rights groups have said they will launch legal challenges against deporting people to Rwanda as quickly as possible. This could delay any removal flights.
- In:
- Immigration
- Rishi Sunak
- Rwanda
- Britain
- Refugee
- Asylum Seekers
- Migrants
- United Kingdom
Haley Ott is the CBS News Digital international reporter, based in the CBS News London bureau.
Twitter InstagramveryGood! (741)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Why isn’t desperately needed aid reaching Palestinians in Gaza?
- Popular North Carolina brewery shuts down indefinitely after co-founder dies in an accident
- Macaulay Culkin and Kieran Culkin Will Reunite Onscreen—Along With Their 3 Other Brothers
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- 3-year-old hospitalized after family's recreational vehicle plunged through frozen lake
- Massive sun-devouring black hole found 'hiding in plain sight,' astronomer say
- Why isn’t desperately needed aid reaching Palestinians in Gaza?
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Georgia lawmakers eye allowing criminal charges against school librarians over sexual content of books
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Widow, ex-prime minister, former police chief indicted in 2021 assassination of Haiti's President Jovenel Moïse
- Attrition vs. tradition: After heavy losses, Tampa Bay Rays hope to defy odds yet again
- Target announces collection with Diane von Furstenberg, including wrap dresses, home decor
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Presidential disaster declaration approved for North Dakota Christmastime ice storm
- Man arrested in Audrii Cunningham's death was previously convicted on child enticement charges
- Former NFL player Marshawn Lynch resolves Vegas DUI case without a trial or conviction
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
California’s Oil Country Hopes Carbon Management Will Provide Jobs. It May Be Disappointed
Georgia lawmakers eye allowing criminal charges against school librarians over sexual content of books
Shoppers Say This TikTok-Loved $1 Lipstick Feels Like a Spa Day for Their Lips
Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
A man tried to open an emergency exit on an American Airlines flight. Other passengers subdued him
Dolly Parton spills on Cowboys cheerleader outfit, her iconic look: 'A lot of maintenance'
Red states that have resisted Medicaid expansion are feeling pressure to give up.